Common Azure pipeline trigger use cases - part 1
May 30, 2020
Azure pipelines are also kind of programs. There are inputs, outputs and a processing logic. In most cases the input is a source repository. Output is the release artifacts like binaries. The processing logic is written using YAML adhering to the schema defined by Azure pipelines. Like all the programs, some event should trigger the execution of the program. These events are defined by the triggers configured in a pipeline. There are mainly two trigger types configurable in a Azure pipeline YAML config. They are Continuous integration (CI) triggers and Pull request validation (PR) triggers.
CI triggers and PR triggers depends on the repository used with the pipeline. Adding commits to a branch and creating a tag are two examples for CI triggers. Opening a PR and pushing changes to a PR are two examples for PR triggers. You can learn more about this different type of triggers from official documentation. Here is an example showcasing the different config options available with triggers.
trigger:
branches:
include:
- master
- releases/*
exclude:
- releases/old*
tags:
include:
- v2.*
exclude:
- v2.0
paths:
include:
- docs/*
exclude:
- docs/README.md
# Pull request related triggers
pr:
branches:
include:
- master
- releases/*
paths:
include:
- docs/*
exclude:
- docs/README.md
I think the config options are self explanatory and needs no detail explanations. Let’s look at some common usecase and see how pipeline triggers are configured to implement them in these series of posts. We will start with the most basic one.
Running Tests and build for all changes pushed
Maintaining quality in a source repository is vital for both the user and developer productivity. The most fundamental way to do that is by keeping the build passing with tests. All the serious software projects use some sort of a build tool to do this. Therefore it’s just a matter of running the build tool against the current version of the source code to see whether it is broken or not. It is a common practice to use a build automation tool like Azure Pipelines, GitHub Actions, Jenkins to perform the build so that the maintainers can take actions on build breaks.
The expected functionality from the build automation tool for this use case is very simple. i.e. watch for code pushes to all branches in the repository an trigger a build. In a repository, there is the default branch (normally called master) which hosts the latest working version of the project. Then there will be few feature branches where the active feature development is done. There can also be few release branches used to release patch versions, etc.
Configuring build automation for all branches of a source repository in Azure Pipeline is very trivial: Have nothing in the trigger sections. Yes, you read it correctly. When a trigger is not specified in the pipeline, the default implicit trigger is following.
trigger:
branches:
include:
- '*'
If you don’t like having no triggers in the pipeline config, you can have above to make it explicit.
The build pipeline can be configured to build all branches except certain branches by using the
triggger/branches/exclude
config. I would recommend against it since it is always better to get
the build status specially when it is the broken state.
…
This is a very trivial trigger use case that can be achieved with Azure pipelines. We will look at more trigger use cases (pushing building and pushing artifacts, running checks against a created PR, updating a deployment with changes, etc) in the next few posts.